Wednesday, August 01, 2007
For an excellent biography of this 19th Century catcher check out this story on Dodger Thoughts.
BTW, it was common with Baseball cards from this era to have many spelling mistakes. Hence, Dailey's name is spelled Daley on the above 1887-88 Old Judge N172 Baseball card.
Pic Link: gfg.com:
These were Johan Santana's words Tuesday after the non-waiver trade deadline passed without another trade: "I'm not surprised. That's exactly how they are. That's why we're never going to go beyond where we've gone"...This guy wants to win. So, I ask, who would you trade for Johan?
"I've been here for eight years, and I've seen a lot of those kind of things," he said. "I've seen a lot of those guys [like Castillo] come in and leave. [The decision makers] don't care. They always talk about caring about it; I don't think they care.
"Because if you're always talking about having young players -- that's the philosophy the team has, and I respect all that -- but it's been proven that it's not enough to go all the way to the World Series"...
"I never give up," Santana said. "Me, personally, I never give up. It's over when the last game of the season's over. I don't know how these guys upstairs think. I'm expecting everybody else to do their jobs and help us win games because I've been so close to being in the World Series.
When I think about it, Santana might be the only guy I would consider trading Kershaw for. Ethier, Hu, Kemp, Loney, Laroche, Abreu, Young, Meleon, Broxton and Orenduff would not be untouchables. He is that good. In fact, there are very few untouchable young Dodgers I would not trade for him.
Story Link: Star Tribune:
Hat Tip: BBWC:
Pic Link: Deadspin:
Over the past several days he has collected numerous questions from the fans to pass along to LA Kings TV color commentator and former player Jimmy Fox. Knowing what a great all-around guy Fox is he was happy to answer every question. In fact, he wrote so much Hammond broke up the interview into 4 parts.
My favorite story from Fox is below.
From Patrick: Jim, what was the worst pummeling you got in a game? I know this wasn't your role, but perhaps you have a memory of a game that got particularly out of control.Story Link: Inside the Kings:
Jim Fox: You're right...that wasn't my role...thank God...as far as I can remember, I was only involved in 2 situations where I received 5 minutes for fighting and I don't think I threw a punch in either case.
The hardest I was hit is easy to remember now, but at the time, I has no idea what had happened...it was game at the Great Western Forum...I had the puck behind Buffalo's net and tried to bring it to the front...well Mike Foligno had other ideas...he lowered his shoulder and hit me full speed right in the jaw...I went spinning into the air and when I landed I had no idea where I was...I was never unconscious, but I was out of it...I do remember being on all fours on the ice...I looked around and it was all fuzzy...I said to myself, I know I can't get up, so just stay where you are
and Pete (Pete Demers, Kings trainer) will come and help you...that's exactly what happened...the next thing a knew I was sitting on the Kings bench with about 12 minutes remaining on the clock (1st period)...the next thing I knew, I was looking at the clock and there was about 2 minutes remaining...I leaned over to Dave Taylor on the bench and told Dave I thought the clock was broken...Dave then went to get Pete and he immediately took me to the dressing room...what I wasn't aware of was that I played 3 shifts that I couldn't remember then and still can't remember...then I remember taking a shower and then I was talking to the doctor but didn't remember anything about how I got in and out of the shower...the doctor asked me some questions about what I had to eat for pre-game meal that day...how I got to the arena...I couldn't remember a thing...I was diagnosed with a slight concussion and missed about 3 days...not a fun time, but something I will always remember...I think?
Inflation, Deflation, Recession... Where are we headed? What does it all mean? What can we reasonably forecast?
All of these issues give me a big headache. I guess you can say that I'm still in the process of trying to understand some of the basics, while, at the same time, trying to apply it to the real world. As a primer I thought I would add the following from the Agonist blog who is asking the same questions.
And so on.. and so on. Are we anywhere near this scenario? I don't think so, but cautious optimism should be your guiding light. As they say in the market, "there are only two emotions on Wall Street: fear and greed." Right now there appears to be a healthy dose of fear to go around.
I’m no economist. But I live at the mercy of the economy, so I read quite a bit on the subject with hopes of learning a thing or two. Understanding the causes for inflation was relatively simple concept for me to grasp. With an ever-increasing supply of money and shortages of essential elements, higher prices are inevitable.
It started when lending institutions loaned money to people on no-money-down, adjustable-rate-mortgages for homes and real estate, and in so doing created a buying frenzy. Good sales created competition and drove up real-estate prices. As values for real-estate grew in what was really a stagnant economy when looked at just from the standpoint of producing and selling products, people took out additional equity loans. Real-estate outpaced other goods in value for a number of consecutive years—somewhere around 15% per year. This could not go on forever. And it hasn’t.
Now interest rates have risen; mortgage payments are re-setting at higher numbers and people are not earning enough money at their job to make payments. Gas and food prices, not included in the government’s inflation rate numbers, are on the rise at an exponential rate.
Then they put the house up for sale. But it doesn’t sell. So they lower the price. And it still doesn’t sell. Money they thought they had in equity vanishes into thin air. At some point, they owe more on the house than it is worth.
Home owners can’t keep the job if they don’t have gas, and everyone must eat. The credit card is essential for these expenditures, so it gets paid before the house payment. With time, the home owner gets farther and farther behind. The day comes when the bank forecloses. The home-owner walks away from the home and finds a cheaper place to rent.
Banks try to sell homes to recuperate money they loaned and they don’t sell. So money the bank thought it had in the form of promises to pay isn’t there. Vanished into thin air. Many of these loans have been packaged and have become part of someone’s retirement fund or investment package. And that retirement fund or investment package ain’t worth a nickel, because masses of people quit making their payments. They are written off of the books; the money they represented also has vanished into thin air.
When all of his happens in enough places at the same time, the people wake up and realize they have no money. They tear up the credit card, leaving another unpaid debt, and consequently destroy more money, and start paying with cash which means they quit buying so much stuff because they don’t have enough money to do so. The stuff doesn’t sell, so the store lowers its prices. And it still doesn’t sell. Before long, the store is in trouble. As are the employees of the store. Stores close, more jobs are lost.
Now you have deflation. Collapse of an economy. A Depression.
I wonder if printing and reintroducing new cash can keep up with the disappearance of all of this money and forestall a collapse. I guess time will tell, because I doubt the fed is going to quit printing money as long as the rest of the world allows them to.
If the fed does tighten cash supplies, what happens when China and a handful of Saudi princes, each of which sit on a trillion or so dollars decide to buy our country? If the fed keeps printing money and we keep buying stuff made in other countries without selling them something in exchange, they end up holding more dollars (now you know why bush wanted to sell our shipping ports).
Our economy is based on its ability to grow continually. But there are limits to growth and we’ve come near realizing what those limits are. This planet has given us all it had to offer and we’re still not satisfied.
Something has to give.
BTW, I ran across an interesting housing blog that is worth a look. Its called the Irvine Housing Blog. The writer is as bearish as the markets look. He provides plenty of anecdotal information about a looming housing crisis in Irvine.